Lawyers to appeal religious liberty issue to U.S. Supreme Court in Terri Schiavo case
Florida’s 2nd DCA denies appeal without comment
By JONI B. HANNIGAN
Managing Editor
Published February 9, 2005
LAKELAND (FBW)-In the second time in less
than a year, the U.S. Supreme Court will be asked to consider an
appeal related to Terri Schiavo, a brain-damaged Florida woman
whose plight has pitted pro-life and euthanasia adversaries
against each other in a case drawing world-wide attention.
 |
| Click
on image for related coverage |
Dismissing an appeal that would have considered the religious liberty rights of Terri Schiavo, Floridas 2nd District Court of Appeal squelched that argument at the state level by issuing their ruling without an opinion Feb. 4.
The ruling leaves Bob and Mary Schindler,
Terris parents, without many options in Florida, but does
clear the way for their attorneys to take the issue of a disabled
persons religious liberty rights all the way to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
We have been all along planning to do
that, Barbara Weller, an attorney with the Gibbs Law
Firm which represents the Schindlers, told Florida Baptist
Witness Feb. 9.
After the 2nd DCAs ruling,
Weller said the Schindlers are doing amazingly well,
but saddened to learn their daughters religious beliefs
apparently are not taken seriously.
Were just very disappointed that
[the 2nd DCA] chose not to deal with such an important
issue of the free exercise of religion, which his one of the most
important foundations of our American government, Weller
continued.
Photo by Joni B. Hannigan
Mary Schindler watches as her daughter, Suzanne Vitadamo (r) wipes a tear after she mounts the platform with her family to thank guests for attending a birthday party on behalf of her sister, Terri Schiavo Dec. 12 in Tampa. Vitadamo credited her mother and father with saving Terri's life again and again, and persevering in the face of great pain and disappointment.
Weller said her firm will continue to press
for Terris religious and due process rights, despite the
refusal by the nations high court to hear an appeal on
whether Terris Law, passed by the Florida Legislature in
2003 was unconstitutional, as the Florida Supreme Court had ruled.
The 2nd DCAs decision, when
it is finalized procedurally Feb. 22, will most likely end a
current stay issued by Pinellas County Circuit Judge George Greer
that temporarily halts his 2000 ruling that healthcare workers,
at the request of Terris husband and guardian, Michael
Schiavo, could discontinue feeding Terri an act that would
result in her death by starvation and dehydration within 7-10
days.
Weller said she believes Michael Schiavos
attorney, George Felos, is incorrect in statements he has made to
the press that healthcare workers will be able to begin the
starvation process again Feb. 22.
We still have other avenues of appeal,
Weller said, explaining that since several courts are involved,
her firm cannot request a stay in anticipation of another stays
expiration.
Greer is expected to rule Feb. 11 whether
another pending motion can proceed. It deals with whether Terri
Schiavos constitutional right to due process was violated
when she was not assigned an independent attorney to represent
her in a battery of court decisions throughout the past six years.
Terri, an otherwise healthy 41-year-old
woman, was found unconscious in her home in 1990 having
suffered brain damage after her heart stopped. Some doctors have
ruled she is in a Persistent Vegetative State. Others agree with
her parents who say that with rehabilitation she might learn to
swallow and be able to improve. Nutrition and hydration has twice
been discontinued in her case and restored only after court
intervention.
A few years after her collapse Michael
Schiavo won over a million dollars in a malpractice suit against
doctors, after which he ended communication with her parents and
placed a do not resuscitate order with healthcare
workers. He told the court Terri would not wish to continue to
live in her present condition and barred efforts to rehabilitate
his wife.
Terris parents have long argued that
Micahel Schiavos continued guardianship of their daughter
presents a conflict of interest. He has lived with his long-time
girl friend, with whom he has had two children, for at least nine
years.
After the 2nd DCAs latest
decision, Mary Schindler told the Witness she wasnt
surprised, but was disappointed the considering the Popes
statements last year that Catholics should not withdraw food and
water. Schindler and her family, including Terri, are devout
Catholics who have said they consider the Popes insight
critical to Terris case.
I take each day at a time and think
about it all of the time, Schindler said of the courts
various rulings and the possibility a court will instruct workers
to discontinue feeding Terri. I keep hoping this time its
not going to happen. So many people are aware that she is just a
healthy brain-damaged person. I pray something can be done.
Recounting a visit with Terri Feb. 7,
Schindler said she appears to be doing well, though maybe a bit
on the sleepy side due to medications she believes
Terri is being given for twitching the family had observed
several weeks ago. According to the Schindlers and their
attorneys, Michael Schiavo has previously ordered healthcare
workers to not discusss Terris medical condition with them.
She laughed and she started trying to
vocalize again, Schindler said of her daughter during the
visit to the hospice where she has lived for several years.
I just keep telling her the same
thing, just hang in there. Youve been so strong so
far. I know you can hold on a little bit longer, Mary
said.
Both Schindler and Weller said they are encouraged by a recent article in The New York Times describing
a breakthrough in testing brain-damaged individuals to see how
much they are aware of their surroundings.
I thought they were talking about my
daughter, Schindler said animatedly. I absolutely
think she should definitely have this test. Absolutely. I would
love to see her have that test and see what she does when she
hears our voices.