Point of View
Pre-millennialism offers pragmatic view of Scripture
By JOHN SULLIVAN
executive director-treasurer
Florida Baptist Convention
Published February 3, 2005
This is the second in a two-part series on the Doctrine of the
Second Coming, a fundamental doctrine for the Christian. In last
weeks issue, we defined the four categories of
interpretation of the last things and many of the terms used when
discussing the Second Coming.
This week, we will provide a basic outline of millennial views
based on Revelation 20:1-7, explaining the characteristics of the
three primary views.
Post or (historical) millennial view
Revelation is a history of the church.
1,000 years of peace precedes the coming of Christ, not
follows.
As the Gospel is preached, the world becomes more
Christian until it becomes almost entirely Christian; then Christ
comes.
The Jews return to Palestine preceding the 1,000 years.
Satan is bound by the preaching of the Gospel.
The battle of Armageddonbattle of good and evilis
currently being fought.
Satan is loosed because of a backsliding church.
A general resurrection and general judgments.
After the judgments, the eternal order begins.
A-millennial view
Most of the Book of Revelation is already fulfilled.
The world is a mixture of good and evil.
No rapture of church occurs, instead a gathering takes
place on earth.
The Lords return not dependent on prophecy.
When the Lord returns, there will be a general
resurrection; those alive will be changed to never die (translated);
general judgment; and eternal order.
Pre-millennial view
The Book of Revelation deals with the end of time, not
the church in history.
Jesus came to establish a kingdom and the Jews rejected
Him. The church is the link in the eternal plan of God until the
Kingdom comes. More than a parenthesis in history.
The rapture of the church will occur at the end of the
church era.
Seven years of tribulation will be directed toward Jews.
At the end of seven years of tribulation the Battle of
Armageddon will be fought.
Christ will save the Jews. It will be a nation saved in a
day.
Satan is bound.
1,000 years reign of peace.
Satan loosed a little while.
Great white throne for wicked dead.
Eternal age to come.
I approach the Second Coming through a pre-millennial
interpretation for several reasons.
First of all, pre-millennialism offers a pragmatic
confirmation of Scripture. It is amazing the number of prophecies
of the Old Testament relating to Israel that receive additional
light in the New Testament. So much prophecy is fulfilled in the
life, ministry and death of our Lord. This not only links the
doctrine of Christ with divine inspiration but also illustrates
pragmatic confirmation of the Word.
Secondly, I think world events must be considered in the light
of Revelation. This would consider the restoration of Israel as a
nation; the attitude of nations toward the Jews; the Arab
uprising and oppression; international political arena;
international religious coalition; the undisciplined church; and
war.
Also, certain Scripture cannot be ignored if we consider
Scripture authoritative. (Joe T. Ole, Is Christ Coming Soon?)
These are:
Rapture (1 Thess. 4:16-17)
Sudden Coming (Matt. 24:27)
All shall see (1 Thess. 5:2)
One takenone left (Matt. 24:40)
Saved to reign with Christ (Rev. 20:4)
Christ to reign (Rev. 19:6)
Satan bound (Rev. 20:1)
Lake of fire (Rev. 20:10)
Tribulation (Matt. 24:21)
Antichrist (2 Thess. 2: 3-10)
Armageddon (Rev. 16:16)
Judgment of nations (Matt. 25:31ff)
Judgment of Christians (2 Cor. 5:10)
Judgment of lost (Rev. 20: 11-15)
Destruction on earth (2 Pet. 3:10-12)
Unique salvation of Israel (Zech. 12:10)
New heavenearth (2 Pet. 3:13)
And finally, the pre-millennial approach is the most literal
and consequentially most functional of all the views. Literal
meaning is the normal approach to any language and makes exegesis
more natural. All secondary meanings are dependent on the literal
meaning of a passage. The Bible makes greater sense when
literally interpreted. The literal approach is not blind to
symbolism, it checks the imagination of men. The literal approach
is most consistent with inspiration.
This is part of an on-going series on doctrine.