|
|||
|
|||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Guest EditorialTsunami: A merciful call from God for repentenceBy JOHN PIPER
|
|
| Click image for related coverage |
Every deadly calamity is a merciful call from God for the living to repent. That was Jesus stunning statement to those who brought him news of calamity. The tower of Siloam had fallen, and 18 people were crushed. What about this, Jesus? they asked. He answered, Do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish (Luke 13:4-5).
The point of every deadly calamity is this: Repent. Let our hearts be broken that God means so little to us. Grieve that He is a whipping boy to be blamed for pain, but not praised for pleasure. Lament that He makes headlines only when man mocks His power, but no headlines for ten thousand days of wrath withheld. Let us rend our hearts that we love life more than we love Jesus Christ. Let us cast ourselves on the mercy of our Maker. He offers it through the death and resurrection of His Son.
This is the point of all pleasure and all pain. Pleasure says: God is like this, only better; dont make an idol out of me. I only point. Pain says: What sin deserves is like this, only worse; dont take offense at me. I am a merciful warning.
But the topless sunbathers amid the tsunami aftermath in Phuket, Thailand, did not get the message. Neither did the man who barely escaped the mighty wave with the help of a jungle gym and palm-leaf roof. He concluded, I am left with an immense respect for the power of nature. He missed it. The point is: reverence for the Creator, not respect for creation.
Writing in The New York Times, David Brooks rightly scorns the celebration of natures might: When Thoreau [celebrates] savage wildness of nature, he sounds, this week, like a boy who has seen a war movie and thinks he has experienced the glory of combat. But Brooks sees no message in the calamity: This is a moment to feel deeply bad, for the dead and for those of us who have no explanation.
David Hart, writing in the Wall Street Journal, goes beyond Brooks and pronounces: No Christian is licensed to utter odious banalities about Gods inscrutable counsels or blasphemous suggestions that all this mysteriously serves Gods good ends.
These responses are foreseen in Scripture: I killed your young men with the sword ... yet you did not return to me, declares the Lord (Amos 4:10). They cursed the name of God who had power over these plagues. They did not repent and give him glory (Revelation 16:9).
Contrary to Harts pronouncement, the Christian Scriptures do indeed license us to speak of Gods inscrutable counsels and how he works in all things for mysterious good ends. To call this banal and blasphemous is like a bird calling the wind under its wing wicked.
Jesus said that the minutest event in nature is under the control of God. Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? And not one of them will fall to the ground apart from your Father (Matthew 10:29). He said this to give hope to those who would be killed for His name.
He Himself stood on the sea and stopped the waves with a single word (Mark 4:39). Even if Nature or Satan unleashed the deadly tidal wave, one word from Jesus would have stopped it. He did not speak it. This means there is design in this suffering. And all His designs are wise and just and good.
One of His designs is my repentance. Therefore, I will not put God on trial. That is my place. And only because of Christ will the waves that one day carry me away bring me safely to His side. Come. Repentance is a good place to be.
EDITOR'S NOTE: On March 30, 2005, John Piper issued the following clarification and apology related to the column:
On January 5, 2005, I wrote an article for the Desiring God website entitled Tsunami and Repentance. In it, I wrote the following:
But the topless sunbathers amid the tsunami aftermath in Phuket, Thailand did not get the message. Neither did the man who barely escaped the mighty wave with the help of a jungle gym and palm-leaf roof. He concluded, I am left with an immense respect for the power of nature. He missed it. The point is: reverence for the Creator, not respect for creation.
The man in reference was Patrick Green, a 28-year-old teacher at Singapore American School, who was quoted in an article written by Janie McCauley of the Associated Press. This is what I read:
"It was ugly and awful. There are some images I will never forget, and some that I might never acknowledge again, Green said. I am left with an immense respect for the power of nature."
But it turns out that this quote is inaccurate. Here is what Mr. Green actually said:
"It was ugly and awful. There are some images I will never forget, and some that I might never acknowledge again. I am left with an immense respect for the power of nature, and even more for the power of God." (my emphasis)
Mr. Green also wrote:
"The wave rushed by on both sides, and over our heads by at least six feet. I guess there are two ways you can look at it. You can believe, I suppose, that palm leaves woven together that normally cant hold back rain water can, in fact, hold back an (at least) 18-foot wave. Or, like me, you can believe in God, and that for some reason, even though it was undeserved at least on my part, he miraculously spared our lives." (my emphasis)
Mr. Green did get the message, that the tsunami teaches us to reverence the Creator for his power and mercy. I sincerely apologize if my public comments served to undermine Mr. Greens reputation in any way.
Archive | About Us | Contact Us | Subscribe | Advertise
Front Page | This Week | Opinion | Florida | National | Features | Bible Study | Classifieds
Copyright © 2001-2008, Florida Baptist Witness,
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.