Point-of-View
SBC stresses sanctity of human life despite earlier hesitancy
By JONI B. HANNIGAN
Managing Editor
Published January 16, 2003
Southern Baptists have recently been reminded of the sanctity
of human life with the tragic slaughter of three medical
missionaries in Yemen Dec. 30. As Americans mark the 30th
anniversary of Roe v. Wade this month, it's ironic that
even after 40 million murdered babies have been the victims of a
"choice" made for them, some people still don't get it.
A friend recently told me the definition of a martyr involves
"choice" on their part. In the case of our
International Mission Board friends, they had chosen to continue
to serve in a part of the world where they would be in eminent
danger of being sacrificed for the cause of proclaiming the
Gospel through their very lives and deeds.
Unborn children have been sacrificed daily on the altar of
their parent's either extremely selfish or tragically misguided
"choice." They are unwilling participants in this
massacre. Babies are offered up hourly and daily to appease
parental "choice," even though fathers typically are
left out of the equation.
And the awful, awful truth is that Southern Baptists could
very easily have helped this country make one of its biggest
mistakes in 1973.
In 1971, messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention annual
meeting in St. Louis approved a resolution that stated, in part:
"We call upon Southern Baptists to work for legislation that
will allow the possibility of abortion...." While the
subsequent wording did indicate this was to be only for certain
cases-the resolution no doubt added fuel to the slow burning fire
ready to ignite the court's decision in Roe v. Wade.
In that same time period, the SBC's Christian Life Commission
(predecessor to what is now the SBC's Ethics & Religious
Liberty Commission), maintained what writer James C. Hefley
called a "foot-dragging policy on abortion."
Led by Foy Valentine, the CLC initially gave only scant
attention to abortion. Valentine often argued the SBC had "spoken
with many voices on abortion," citing part of a resolution
passed at the 1976 SBC annual meeting in Kansas City. The
resolution, which referred also to the 1971 action, appeared to
support Roe v. Wade, citing the "right of expectant mothers
to the full range of medical services ... for the preservation of
life and health," according to volume two of Hefley's six-volume
series, The Truth in Crisis: The Controversy in the Southern
Baptist Convention.
The 1976 resolution went further however in noting a "conviction"
Southern Baptists had about the "limited role of government"
in abortion matters.
Throughout the seventies and into the eighties, Valentine and
the CLC fought the efforts of many pastors and individuals who
believed the SBC should offer a strong moral opinion against
abortion. Even after messengers to the 1980 SBC annual meeting in
St. Louis passed what is considered its first strongly "pro-life"
resolution, the CLC continued to ignore the grass roots
opposition to its "pro-choice" position.
In 1985, through the efforts of a growing conservative
resurgence, messengers to the SBC annual meeting in Dallas voted
to place a Sanctity of Human Life Sunday on the denominational
calendar. This move meant the CLC would have to provide materials
for the day's observance.
Hefley correctly predicted the observance "would give the
impression to the world that the SBC was solidly linked with the
pro-life movement, which was what conservatives wanted and
moderates, as represented by Valentine and the Christian Life
Commission did not."
We've come a long way, baby. In 2003, Southern Baptists have
an ERLC that considers Sanctity of Human Life issues a high
priority. We have Pregnancy Care Centers throughout Florida and
across the country. But the fight's not over.
Early American poet Emily Dickinson said: "Success is
counted sweetest, by those who ne'er succeed." It's been a
long haul. I'm not particularly proud of the fact that it took
Southern Baptists so many years to come alongside other pro-lifers
in this battle-but I know God, in His sovereignty, allowed that
to happen for a reason.
Maybe now is the time to do what it takes, to go above and
beyond to count the sweet success of knowing we have done all
that we are able. Maybe this is the hour for Southern Baptists,
educated and aided by a virtually unflappable SBC ERLC president,
Richard Land, to shine.
While the world's attention is on our missionaries and the
precious contributions they made to share the Gospel and make the
world a better place for others, let's take the opportunity to
wipe out a practice that leaves our unborn children at the mercy
of a "choice" in which they have no part.
For related coverage, see Sanctity of Human Life Archive