Photo by Joni B. Hannigan
The battle over the constitutionality of "Terri's Law" ended up at the Florida Supreme Court Aug. 31 when lawyers for Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, faced off with Michael Schiavo, Terri's estranged husband who has fought more almost a decade to have the feeding and nutrition tube removed from the disabled woman so that she will die. Schiavo has engaged in a legal tug-o-war with Terri Sciavo's family who have followed the battle all the way to the high court--in hopes one of them will be appointed her legal guardian so that they can authorize rehabilitation for the brain damaged 40-year-old Clearwater resident. At the Supreme Court to hear oral arguments after being denied the right to be a party to the case, are (l-r) Terris' sister, Suzanne Schindler Vitadamo; her brother, Robert "Bobby" Schindler Jr.; and her parents, Mary and Robert "Bob" Schindler. A decision is expected to be handed down by the end of September.
TALLAHASSEE (FBW)-Florida's Gov. Jeb Bush filed a motion Oct.
4 asking the Florida State Supreme Court to reconsider its Sept.
23 ruling in which justices said a law allowing the governor to
order the resumption of Terri Schiavo's feeding and hydration
tube unconstitutional.
 |
| Click
on image for related coverage |
The 17-page motion said the high court's decision had
incorrectly assumed Bush's actions were unconstitutional, they
did not allow him "due process" in exploring
information that had been presented to lower courts, and
incorrectly applied an analysis of the separation of powers that
could eventually "throw the operation of state government
into disarray."
"The Florida Legislature has passed numerous laws giving
governors broad discretion in specific circumstances," Bush
said in a written statement. "The Court's ruling could call
those laws into question, and may limit the Legislature's ability
to govern."
At issue, the motion asserted, is the fundamental
responsibility of the government to protect the disabled.
"The protection of vulnerable persons with disabilities
requires that all three branches remain vigilant in defense of
their rights," read Bush's motion.
The governor's communications director, Jill Bratina, told
Focus on the Family the governor was seeking the Court's
clarification in the interest of all of Florida's citizens.
"In life and death issues the governor feels that we
always need to err on the side of life," Bratina told the
Colorado-based group. " And that's what the law that the
Legislature passed allowed to happen."
The 40-year-old disabled woman at the center of the legal
debate, Terri Schiavo, has been in what some doctors consider a
persistent vegetative state since 1990 when she collapsed under
suspicious circumstances in her home. Her husband and legal
guardian Michael Schiavo, who has fathered two children with his
live-in girlfriend, has sought the removal of his wife's feeding
tube for nearly a decade.
Terri Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, have long
maintained their daughter has not received the rehabilitation and
care she requires. Their attorneys have unsucessfuly filed
motions on their behalf and the behalf Terri Schiavo's siblings
challenging Michael Schiavo's guardianship and asking to be able
to care for Terri themselves.
The case received international attention last year when the
Florida Legislature passed a measure allowing Gov. Bush to
intervene after Terri's feeding tube was removed by order of
Florida Circuit Court Judge George Greer. It was the second time
Terri's feeding tube had been removed as the result of a court
order. Michael Schiavo filed suit, alleging the governor's
actions were unconstitutional. The Schindlers were not granted
standing in Michael Schiavo's case against the governor.
In the Oct. 4 motion, Ken Connor, Bush's lead attorney, said
rules of constitutional construction are premised on the
assumption that "the legislature the Governor know and
understand the nature and limits of their constitutional
authority." Bush's intervention then would be appropriate as
he looks to enforcement of the law.
In addition, the motion states there are "other unproven
assertions" in the opinion which mirror language in lower
court decisions not "supported by competent facts in the
record," in cases the governor was not a party to. Examples
of statements in the motion are that "Terri and Michael were
'happily married,' that Terri's cardiac arrest was 'a result of
potassium imbalance,' that Terri has no 'cognition or awarness,'
that '[M]edicine cannot cure this condition,' that Terri is
'unconscious' and 'reflexive'; and that there is 'no hope of a
medical cure.'"
Michael Schiavo's attorneys have until Oct. 11 to respond.
In related news, lawyers for the Schindlers filed a new 28-page
memorandum Sept. 30 with Greer outlining a new argument based on
information that Terri, a Roman Catholic, would want adhere to
the pope's latest teaching-therefore any removal of her feeding
tube would be in violation of her right to religious freedom.
The Schindlers lawyers note that, given the overwhelming
evidence of Terri's life-long faith and devotion to the Church
she would never willingly defy the Church's teaching.
In a statement made last March, Pope John Paul II condemned
the removal of a feeding tube of a patient in a "persistent
vegetative state," while at the same time decrying the
classification of a human being as a "vegetable" in any
description.
The Schindler's long-time attorney, Pat Anderson, withdrew
from the case just before the hearing, turning the matter over to
David Gibbbs III, a religious liberty attorney who has worked
previously with Anderson and is on the board of directors for the
Christian Law Association. Gibbs appeared on Larry King Live with
the Schindlers Sept. 28.
"I am reclaiming my life," Anderson, from St.
Petersburg, Fla., told the St. Petersburg Times. "It's
just time to leave. I've done my part shoving that rock up the
hill. Maybe I'll be able to finally sleep through the night
without waking up at 3 a.m. remembering some detail."
George Felos, Michael Schiavo's attorney, said the pope's
words are not an official religious pronouncement banning the
removal of feeding tubes, according to the Times.
Greer has not yet ruled issued any new rulings related to the
matter.
--For related stories go to the special report: Terri Schiavo; A life at Stake.