CLEARWATER (FBW)Telling them they wont need a
security guard, but they will need to make sure not to violate
their daughters privacy, Judge George W. Greer ruled June 4
that Terri Schiavos parents can resume visiting their
daughter at the Clearwater assisted living facility where she
lives.
 |
| Click
on image for related coverage |
Bob and Mary Schindler are parents of the 40-year-old brain
damaged woman at the center of a national right-to-die
debate. They have been allowed by her husband and legal guardian,
Michael Schiavo, to visit her only twice since March 29 when
Schiavo accused them of causing punture-like wounds on her arms.
Terri Schiavo collapsed under mysterious circumstances 14
years ago at which time her brain was deprived of oxygen.
Though he cleared the Schindlers of any wrondoing in the
wounds on her arms, Greer warned the Schindlers against allowing
anyone to video tape their disabled daughter.
This court has consistently depended on the Schindler
family to not only conduct themselves appropriately when they
visit, but also monitor their relatives and friends who visit,
Greer wrote in his decision.
Bob Schindler admitted to Greer under oath that he had
videotaped his daughter right before her feeding tube was set to
be removed for the second time in two years, last October.
The Schindlers have been in a battle with Schiavo for over six
years throughout which he has asked the court to be allowed to
disconnect Terris feeding tube. Schiavo has said Terri
would want to be allowed to die. Her parents have said she has
never been given the rehabilitation doctors advised. Schiavo had
petitioned the court to limit the Schindlers visits and
require them to pay an off-duty officer to watch them while they
were in their daughters room. He had sought to add further
restrictions to a 2000 order entered by another judge.
In October, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush signed Terris
Law, ordering her feeding tube reinserted six days after it
was removed as a result of Greers decision to grant Schiavos
request. Schiavo has challenged the constitutionality of that
law.
Late last month an appeals court forwarded that challenge to
the Florida Supreme Court, which will decide whether to fast
track the case or send it back to the 2nd Circuit Court for a
ruling.