| I read with great
disappointment Howard J. Roszaks editorial in the Mar. 4 issue of the Witness. Mr.
Roszak began by stating "The Passion of Christ is a
very Catholic movie..." I
had hoped that we would all unite behind this film and
not start the labeling and dissecting the movie. While
Mr. Roszak makes many valid points about the content of
the movie later in the article, he immediately puts us on
the defensive, which is very unfortunate.
This movie provides the Christian
community an opportunity to unite like never before, and
we must, as Christians, be united in our support of this
film, and prepare to minister to those who will seek
answers to the questions it will produce.
Whether there was motivation from The
Dolorous Passion or not is irrelevant. The content
of this movie is based on Scripture, with, as Mr. Gibson
himself has stated, "some literary license." As
I watched the movie, I found nothing that was not
plausible.
Further, I was refreshed to see Mary
have a significant role. It made the movie that much more
believable. What mother would not be present at the trial
and sentencing of her son? The Scriptures again do not
give us detail to support this, but Mary is the mother of
Jesus and was to the very end, weeping and grieving for
her son. We must be careful not to label any focus on the
role of Mary as being "driven by the
Catholics."
Finally, let us be careful, not to be
so critical of literary license simply because it is a
faith-based film. Many of the accounts in Scripture leave
large gaps of time unaccounted. Therefore, when a writer
seeks to bridge those gaps, let us not be so critical
that we do more harm than good with our comments.
If you have not seen this film, please
go see it. However, when you do, watch it with an open
heart to find ways you can use this film as a tool for
evangelism.
|