The attorney for most of the evangelical chaplains alleging
discrimination by the U.S. Navy has asked a federal court to
cancel a Reserve chaplain's appointment to active duty at
Jacksonville's Naval Air Station.
A petition seeking the order was filed Nov. 25 in U.S. District
Court in connection with a case filed by the Chaplaincy of Full
Gospel Churches on behalf of eight plaintiffs.
But Vienna, Va., attorney Art Schulcz, who represents 56 current
and former chaplains in five lawsuits filed since 1999, said the
issue affects all evangelical chaplains.
Schulcz said the appointment of a Catholic priest to the position
of commander at the Jacksonville base, despite him having no
prior active duty service, violates Naval regulations.
Those rules prohibit calling up reserve chaplains at the grade of
lieutenant commander or higher, unless a need cannot be met
through promotion of an active duty chaplain, he added.
Such prohibitions were enacted to prevent reservists from being
placed on active duty in positions of authority over men who have
"paid their dues," the attorney said.
"We're saying this is an example that underlines the
prejudice we're alleging in these cases," Schulcz said.
"They have regulations designed to eliminate friction in the
ranks, and here's a guy given a free pass, contrary to the
regulations. It's illegal."
According to the petition, the Navy fraudulently concealed the
appointment of John Lyle to active duty by first designating his
orders for call-up as a "student flight surgeon." The
court filing called this a plan of deception, including orders
for a flight physical qualification and flight training, which it
said never occurred.
The orders also directed Lyle to report to a base at Quantico, Va.,
for 208 days of temporary duty starting in October 2001, which
the petition said violated federal rules.
Those rules specify a 20-week maximum for temporary duty and a
maximum of 180 days in extraordinary circumstances, according to
the petition. The same illegal orders transferred him to
Jacksonville, "where, without any requisite active duty
experience or unique qualification to meet any special need, he
became the command chaplain," it said.
It claimed the Navy also used deceit by not treating Lyle's 208
days at Quantico as temporary duty, using an accounting code
designed to hide his status as a Reservist being called to active
duty.
Calling Reserve chaplains as lieutenant commanders or commanders
reduces promotion, retention and career opportunities for junior
career officers, the petition said.
Such action generates resentment among active duty officers who
have to pay "dues" via deployments, family separations,
long hours and dangerous assignments for the opportunity to
compete for promotions, it added.
"This is why the (regulations) forbid such recalls,"
the petition said. "Complicit Department of Navy officials
appear to have deliberately orchestrated these violations to
cover up the illicit nature of (Cmdr.) Lyle's access and his
preferential treatment by deceiving the personnel system and
defrauding the finance system.
"This whole occurrence illustrates the Navy's practice of
preferring some favored denominations while prejudicing (evangelical)
plaintiffs."
In a previous filing in this case, the Navy's chief of chaplains
stated that chaplain promotions had become competitive, the
petition said.
Thus, it cannot now deny that serving as a command chaplain is an
important consideration when considering candidates for
promotion, it said. Likewise, the Navy cannot deny that illegally
depriving an active duty commander or lieutenant commander the
opportunity to serve as a command chaplain is prejudice, the
petition said.
"In orchestrating a cover-up of these blatantly regulatory
violations, the conspiracy has resulted in waste, fraud and
abuse," it stated.
"The (Navy's) active facilitation of, and involvement in,
these conspiratorial actions prejudices plaintiffs and
illustrates the very pattern of abuse and bias identified in the
plaintiffs' complaints, which these suits seek to eliminate."
The petition asks the federal court to issue an order (known as a
writ of mandamus) directing the Secretary of the Navy to:
* Follow his own regulations concerning the recall of Naval
Reserve chaplains for active duty in the Chaplain Corps;
*Comply with government accounting, expenditure and financial
reporting standards;
* Investigate waste, fraud and abuse arising from these
violations, and
* Where possible, recoup funds illegally spent through the
alleged conspiracy.
Although the Department of Justice, which is representing the
Navy, has a policy of not commenting on court filings, the
government is expected to file a response to the petition by the
second week of December.
The Navy's public affairs office has also repeatedly declined to
comment on the lawsuits.