Legislature pressed to act in defense of life in case of Terri Schiavo
By JONI B. HANNIGAN
Managing Editor
Published January 8, 2004
TAMPA (FBW)In a state where a death sentence can be
appealed again and again, it didnt sit well with members of
both chambers of the legislature that Terri Schiavo faced
imminent death unless drastic measures were taken to remedy the
situation.
Speaker of the House, Johnnie Byrd (R-Plant City), who
initiated a bill that Gov. Jeb Bush signed into law, said
recently in an interview with Florida Baptist Witness,
he believed there had been a lot of "disturbing information"
about her case that caused him to think "something had gone
terribly wrong."
Also interviewed by the Witness, Daniel Webster (R-Winter Garden), who sponsored the Senate bill, said he believed the court
had, in effect, ordered her death. "Under any other
circumstance, when capital punishment is dealt out, in any
criminal case, the Supreme Court of the state automatically
reviews that death sentence."
Terri Schiavo is the 40-year-old brain damaged woman from
Clearwater who is at the center of an international debate over
her so-called "right-to-die" [see related story in this
issue, "Florida case draws
international attention as Sanctity of Human Life Sunday nears"].
Byrd said it was within the legislatures responsibility
in this case to intervene when it appeared clarification was
needed. He noted a problem with what he called an "activist
judiciary" and a muddying of the waters between the
legislative and the judicial branches.
"What we were trying to say is, there is a dispute and
when there is no written directive, you need to err on the side
of life," said Byrd. "The whole collision here is
between people who think they should decide what quality of life
is worth living, and its certainly not for me to say that."
Webster said there is already a two-prong test that dileniates
between life and death.
"Everybody above that line is alive; anybody below that
line is dead," he said. In regards to cardio pulmonary
function and brain activity, Terri Schiavo meets the definition
of a live human being, he added.
"She is an innocent woman," Webster said. "Shed
done nothing wrong and yet the court ordered her executed."
Webster said if the Supreme Court had taken the case, the
legislature would not have had to act. Instead, he said, they
left a "void" requiring action.
"Had we not acted, that line that we established
legislatively, thats been upheld all the way to the Supreme
Court, would have moved and there would have been a new line
established by the court on where life begins and ends.
"Therefore, by acting, all we did was maintain the line
right where it is," Webster added. "And I think thats
the basis for the case ... and I think thats why all our
colleagues did the same."