Editorial
Defining indecency down at the FCC
By JAMES A. SMITH SR.
Executive Editor
Published December 11, 2003
(Parents, this editorial is not suitable for children)
Hollywood got an early Christmas present this year when the
Federal Communications Commission recently endorsed indecent
speech on the nations airwavessomething that seemed
impossible in our already terribly indecent television and radio
programming and made the job of parenting just a little bit
harder in the process.
Undoubtedly thinking of former United States Senator Daniel
Patrick Moynihans influential 1993 essay, "Defining
Deviancy Down," eight pro-family groups in a brief decrying
the FCCs decision to allow the use of the "f-word"
in broadcast media has asked the government agency to reverse the
Oct. 3 action, noting, "Instead of taking steps to reduce
broadcast indecency, the Enforcement Board has once again defined
indecency down and, in the process, extended a broad invitation
to broadcasters to fill the public airwaves with dirty words...."
The FCC action (or, rather, inaction) came in response to a
complaint filed by the Parents Television Council urging the
Commission to punish television stations which aired a live, NBC
telecast of the "Golden Globe Awards" on January 19,
2003, in which rocker Bono exclaimed, "This is f- - - - - -
brilliant!" Because the use of the word "does not
describe or depict sexual or excretory activities and organs"
and was a "fleeting and isolated" remark, the FCC found
that the indecency laws were not violated and no punishment was
necessary. Instead, the FCCs so-called enforcement
officials found that Bonos use of the word was "as an
adjective or expletive to emphasize an exclamation."
Got it? The FCC says its okay to the use the "fword"
on television and radio, so long as the performer is just
attempting to underscore his or her lewd point!
Ironically, Bono, lead singer of the rock band U2, has
received a great deal of positive attention in certain Christian
media in the last several years because of his challenge to
church leaders to become involved in the fight against the AIDS
pandemic on the continent of Africa. Bono, who claims to be a
Christian, has bemoaned the relative inaction of believers on
AIDS, even while recognizing that it is only through the
heightened involvement of Christiansand particularly
evangelicalsthat real progress can be made on this social
scourge.
"I really am surprised and even a little disappointed
that I cant continue to beat up the church, because they
have really responded," Bono told a Chicago Sun-Times reporter
in a story published Dec. 5, noting that evangelicals are largely
responsible for President Bushs decision to request vastly
increased AIDS funding for Africa.
Without intending it, Bono has once again stirred-up
evangelicals.
Since the news about the FCCs response to Bonos
remark on the "Golden Globe Awards," the Commission has
been bombarded with letters and e-mail urging action. American
Family Association reports that its more than 150,000 e-mail
recently temporarily shut down the FCCs e-mail system.
The concern is warranted. It is undeniable that this decisionif
left in placewill "open the floodgates for an
unrelenting stream of such language," as Rep. Charles
Pickering, R-Miss., said in a letter to the FCC. "No
ordinary American stops to consider how the f-word is
used ... before deciding whether it is indecent or profane to his
or her own self or family. It is time for the FCC to follow this
model and apply simple, ordinary common sense to such situations
in the interest of the American public."
In a joint letter to FCC chairman Michael Powell, more than 30
representatives, including Florida congressman Dave Weldon, a
Republican from the 15th congressional district, decried the FCCs
response, noting that it "sends a poor message to the
entertainment industry about the FCCs willingness to
enforce standards for broadcast indecency."
Families "feel that the federal government has sided with
media elites and turned a blind eye to the concerns of ordinary
Moms and Dads," the letter continued.
The brief by the pro-family groups, including Morality in
Media, Focus on the Family, Family Research Council and the
American Family Association, was filed Dec. 3 in support of the
Parent Television Councils Application for Review of the
Enforcement Bureaus order. The groups note that the
decision on the "Golden Globe Awards" follows a pattern
of FCC inaction for more than two decades, adding that the agency
has never fined a broadcast television network affiliate for
indecent programming provided by one of the broadcast networks.
"Just as a cop on the beat cannot prevent every mugging,
so the Commission cannot prevent every violation of the broadcast
indecency law," the brief argues. "But when cops do
their jobs well, there is less crime; and when the FCC begins to
do its job well, there will be less broadcast indecency."
In spite of the large outcry, the American Family Association
is asking for even more response to force the Commission to re-visit
this matter. You can contact the FCC through AFAs Web site:
www.afa.net, or
letters can be addressed to: The Honorable Michael Powell,
Chairman, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20554.
Tell the FCC to stop defining indecency down.